Anime-Original Content is Actually a Good Thing

Anime-original content gets a bad rap. It’s understandable why; years of boring filler and awful original endings have poisoned the well, leaving anime fans suspicious of adaptations which aren’t panel-for-panel and word-for-word. But as understandable as the resistance to anime-original content is, it’s wrong-headed. Direct adaptations may be preferable to butchered, poorly written original material, but a truly tailored adaptation will be the best option any day of the week. Good creators can imbue their own touch into the material, making mediocre works great and strengthening already strong works.

Generally, the idea of a direct adaptation makes sense. Adding content to an anime will change the original work fundamentally, often for the worse. But it’s simply a fact that shifting mediums must lead to a shift in presentation. Panel-for-panel adaptations are appealing to fans because they include everything people like about the original work. But those types of adaptations never reach their true potential. The simple reason why is that an adaptation does not need to copy the exact details of the original work. Rather, a good adaptation will copy the spirit of another work while transforming it into its own, becoming something that can stand independently, without the original work looming over it.

KyoAni is a master at this. It’s well-known that KyoAni is a studio willing to change works to suit their needs, and it almost always pays off. Take for instance the example of K-On! Originally a fairly mediocre CGDCT 4-koma, K-On! was elevated by Yamada Naoko into one of the greatest works in the slice-of-life genre. According to this person on Reddit, more than 80% of K-On! is anime-original. That’s simply astounding, and it more than worked out. Almost none of the intricate characterization or deeply emotional moments show up in the manga, and it’s just a generally lesser work. Here, it’s clear that anime-original content was a good thing.

This is true for KyoAni’s other shows too, of course. Dragon Maid gained a lot from KyoAni, as we got better characterization and a shift in tone which led to a great reflection on family. The bulk of Dragon Maid’s stellar final episode was original, as were many other episodes. This remains true in Nichijou, in Hyouka, in Koe no Katachi, and in all of their works. KyoAni understands that anime is a different medium from light novels or manga, and so they adjust their shows accordingly, benefiting in the process.

And the people at KyoAni aren’t the only ones who understand the necessity of changing, and therefore elevating, an adaptation. Aria had a number of anime-original episodes and a number of episodes which further fleshed out existing stories, and this added a lot to our understanding of Neo-Venezia. Sae’s sister in Hidamari Sketch was wholly original before Ume Aoki liked her enough to put her in the manga. There are so many examples where small or large changes occur to the benefit of the adaptation, and it disappoints me that people clamor so heavily for direct adaptations.

As an example of where direct adaptations can go wrong, just look at this season’s Centaur no Nayami. Centaur is based on a manga I really like, but it’s one of the laziest adaptations I’ve ever seen. It’s panel-for-panel, but it makes no attempt to adapt itself to its new medium. This leads to awkward timing, stale jokes, and punchlines that just don’t land. Of course, this is basically the worst you can do when it comes to direct adaptation, but its key mistakes are duplicated by other shows that take the path, even if it’s to a lesser extent.

It’s probably clear from my examples that original content works better for slice-of-life shows. That’s true, since slice-of-life shows are less defined by their plot, and thus alterations have less impact on the future and pacing of the show. That said, this applies to other works as well. A good creator can integrate anime-original content with the adapted material, no matter the genre. Well-liked shows such as Monogatari and Mob Psycho 100 change little things here and there in order to better fit the animated medium, and that’s almost always a good thing. Just look at this season’s My Hero Academia to see how expanding material can help flesh out a show.

Ultimately, one thing is clear. An anime should try and be a good anime, not a good manga. The quality of the original work is, while not unimportant, far less vital than people seem to believe. What really matters is a good staff that knows how to make good anime. If you have that, the product should turn out well, whether it diverges from its source or not.

5 thoughts on “Anime-Original Content is Actually a Good Thing

  1. An example of an amazing manga with an inferior / sub-par anime adaptation is One Piece. In the manga each panel feels alive and bursting with momentum into the next and continuing for chapters on end, but the show slows down the pacing a lot and makes it feel a lot less vibrant and energetic than its source. This isn’t to say the show doesn’t improve, but it does take a long time, and personally I don’t feel it doesn’t do a good enough job in the beginning to warrant choosing it over the manga.

    Outside of anime, the Lord of the Rings is a perfect example of how to adapt a work without strictly adhering to the book and knowing what works in adaptation and what doesn’t. Film and books are different mediums of different lengths and inevitably some things must be omitted or altered for the betterment of the adaptation (that is not to say this is always done well or pays off). Both nerdwriter and JustWrite have done videos on LotR in particular, as an example of how to do an adaptation and a few of their points match up with the ones you’ve raised here.

    I’m glad to hear someone else raise their voice about this as I feel it is important to rid the notion any adaptations must have a 1:1 direct equivalent with the source material. It’s utterly pointless when the source material exists in the first place.


  2. Totally agree that regardless of the source, when you are making an anime you have to make a good anime. That means change is needed because we aren’t watching a slide show of a manga or hearing a transcript of a light novel. Criticising an anime because it isn’t the same as the source is really not a helpful criticism. Criticising it because they didn’t both to adapt to the new medium, or because the adaptations they made didn’t help on the other hand makes sense.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s